Cost Effective Hybridge Models for Allocating Industrial Machine Maintenance Budget in a Dynamic Economy
Abstract
In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, understanding the cost of failure has become increasingly crucial. The cost of failure refers to the financial and non financial consequences that arise from unsuccessful projects, initiatives, or processes. It encompasses not only the direct monetary losses but also the indirect impacts on reputation, customer satisfaction, and employee morale. Prevention is better than cure. Avoiding cost of failure occurrence is better than proffering solution after its ill effect. This is purely medicine after death. This study found this as gap in literature that needs the attention of economic researcher. Hence the development cost effective models capable of allotting available budget optimally for its effective usage. By this, failed projects that often results in wasted resources, such as time, labor, and materials as well as failed projects that demoralize employees, leading to decreased productivity and increased turnover rates will be under control from onset. Cost effectiveness models are analytical tools that help businesses compare the costs and benefits of different alternatives and make informed decisions. This study identified the required strategic decisions, with their attributes and their models adopted from literature for the required logics to these models. The computer algorithms was developed as well as the software model using a JAVA scripts for its implementation for decision making. Performance index of each machine were: Winnowing machine (WM is 0.324) ; Milling Machine (MM is 0.327); While that of Liquor Press Machine ( LPM was 0.349). The company available maintenance budget (AB) for the three machines in 2025 was Eighteen Million, Six hundred and forty five Thousands (18,645,000) Naira. Using the performance index of each machine to predict what should be allocated to each of this machine in 2025 maintenance activities ; Winnowing Machine Allocation Budget (ABwm), 6,040,980 Naira; Milling Machine Allocation Budget (ABmm), 6,096,915 Naira. While that of Liquor Press Machine Allocation Budget (ABlpm), 6,507,105 Naira. This model is very simple and easy to use. It will find its application in small , medium and large scale industries.
References
Quade E S. A (1971). History of Cost-Effectiveness. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation; 1971:1–22. [Google Scholar]
. Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., and Weimer, D.L.(2011). “Chapter 18: Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis”. In Cost-Benefit Analysis Concepts and Practice, Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Gray AM, Clarke PM, Wolstenholme JL.( 2010). Applied Methods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Healthcare. First ed. United States of America: Oxford University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
. Brown, E.D., and Tanner, J.C. (2019). Integrating Value for Money and Impact Evaluations: Issues, Institutions, and Opportunities. Policy Research Working Paper 9041. World Bank. Ac Availableat: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/862091571145787913/pdf/Integrating-Value-for-Money-and-Impact-Evaluations-Issues-Institutions-and-Opportunities.pdf(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Bhula, R., M. Mahoney, and K. Murphy. (2020). “Conducting Cost-effectiveness Analysis [Set of Online Resources].” Available at: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/resource/conducting-cost-effectiveness-analysis-cea(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Cameron, D. B., A. Mishra, and A. N. Brown. (2015). “The Growth of Impact Evaluation for International Development: How Much Have We Learned?” Journal of Development Effectiveness 8 (1), 1-21. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Tan SS, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, (2009). Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services. Eur J Health Econ. 2009;10:39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
. Capturing Cost Data.(2019). “Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF) at the World Bank and the International Rescue Committee (IRC).” Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/994671553617734574/Capturing-Cost-Data-190314.pdf(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Hummel N, Debray TPA, Didden EM, (2017). Methodological guidance, recommendations and illustrative case studies for (network) meta-analysis and modelling to predict real-world effectiveness using individual participant and/or aggregate data. Brussels: Innovative Medicines Initiative;2017
. Dhaliwal, I., E. Duflo, R. Glennerstser, and C. Tulloch.(2013). “Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Policy in Developing Countries: A General Framework with Applications for Education.” In Education Policy in Developing Countries, edited by P. Glewwe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 285–338. (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Vermeer M, Kievit W, Kuper HH, (2013). Treating to the target of remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is cost-effective: results of the DREAM registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:350.
. Drummond, M. F., M. J. Sculpher, K. L. Claxton, G. L. Stoddart, and G. W. Torrance. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Fourth ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Gold MR, Siege JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC.( 2015. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicinex.Availableat: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190492939.001.0001/acprof-9780190492939
. Evans, D., and A. Popova.( 2014). “Cost-Effectiveness Measurement in Development: Accounting for Local Costs and Noisy Impacts (English).” Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 7027 Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/969291468340210399/Cost-effectiveness-measurement-in-development-accounting-for-local-costs-and-noisy-impacts(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
.Michaud TL, Abraham J, Jalal H, (2015). Cost-effectiveness of a statewide campaign to promote aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002321.
. Filmer, D., H. Rogers, N. Angrist, and S. Sabarwal.( 2020). “Learning-adjusted Years of Schooling (LAYS): Defining a New Macro Measure of Education.” Economics of Education Review 77: 101971. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101971. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Simoens S.( 2010). Health economic assessment: cost-effectiveness thresholds and other decision criteria. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:1835–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
. Fleming, F. (2013). “Evaluation Methods for Assessing Value for Money.” Better Evaluation. Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: https://www.betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/Evaluating%20methods%20for%20assessing%20VfM%20-%20Farida%20Fleming.pdf(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Gomez GB, Dowdy DW, Bastos ML, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis treatment shortening: a model-based analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:726.
. Goodman, C. S. (2014). “Health Technology Assessment 101: Economic Analysis Methods.” National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR). Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/ta10107.html(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Griffiths, U. K., R. Legood, and C. Pitt. (2016). “Comparison of Economic Evaluation Methods across Low-income, Middle-income, and High-income Countries: What are the Differences and Why?” Health Economics 25 (Supplement 1): 29–41. doi:10.1002/hec.3312.(Open in a new window)PubMed (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Uyl-de Groot CA, van Rooijen EM, Punt CJA, (2018). . Real-world cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on patient chart review in the Netherlands. Health Econ Rev. 2018;8:13.
. Levin, H. M.(1975). “Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Evaluation Research.” In Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 2. Chap. 5, edited by M. Guttentag, and E. L. Struening. Washington, D.C.: Sage 346–368 . (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2006).. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd ed. Thrid ed. New York: OUP Oxford; 2006:464. [Google Scholar]
. Levin, H. M., P. J. McEwan, C. Belfield, A. B. Bowden, and R. Shand.( 2018). Economic Evaluation in Education: Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-cost Analysis. Third ed. Washington, D.C.: Sage. (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ (2005). Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14:487–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
. McEwan, P. J. (2011). “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Education and Health Interventions in Developing Countries.” Office of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness, Inter-American Development Bank. Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Cost-Effectiveness-Analysis-of-Education-and-Health-Interventions-in-Developing-Countries.pdf(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Stevens A, Milne R, Burls A.(2003). Health technology assessment: history and demand. J Public Health Med. 2003;25:98–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
. McIntosh, C., and A. Zeitlin (2020). “Using Household Grants to Benchmark the Cost Effectiveness of a USAID Workforce Readiness Program.” ArXiv e-print. USAID, 2 September 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.01749.pdf(open in a new window) (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. Brandao SMG, Rezende PC, Br
unner-La Rocca HP, 2018). Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
. Sen, A. K. (2000). “The Discipline of Cost-benefit Analysis.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (S2): 931–952. doi:10.1086/468100.(Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
. United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)( 2014).. Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Wahington, D.C.: EPA; 2014. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/guidelines-preparing-economic-analyses. [Google Scholar]
. Standards for the Economic Evaluation of Educational and Social Programs.(2021). “Cost Analysis Standards Project, American Institutes for Research.” Accessed March 25, 2021. Available at: https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/Standards-for-the-Economic-Evaluation-of-Educational-and-Social-Programs-CASP-May-2021.pdf. Google Scholar
. Cho J-H, Jang HM, Jung H-Y, (2018). A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sevelamer versus calcium acetate in Korean dialysis patients. Clin Ther. 2018;40:123–134
. Sullivan, S. D., J. A. Mauskopf, F. Augustovski, J. J. Caro, K. M. Lee, M. Minchin, E. Orlewska, P. Penna, J.-M. Rodriguez Barrios, and W.-Y. Shau. (2014). “Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value in Health.” Volume 17, Issue 1, January–February 2014, Pages 5-14.
. Walls, E. C. Tulloch, and C. H.-V. Keuren. (2020). “Cost Analysis Guidance for USAID-Funded Education Activities, Second edition.” Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development. Available at: https://www.edu-links.org/resources/usaid-cost-measurement(open in a new window).
.Teng M, Zhao YJ, Khoo AL (2018). Cost-effectiveness analysis of biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents incorporating real-world evidence. Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;36:e12442.
. Wilkinson, T., M. J. Sculpher, K. Claxton, P. Revill, A. Briggs, J. A. Cairns, Y. T( 2016) . “The International Decision Support Initiative Reference Case for Economic Evaluation: An Aid to Thought.” Value in Health 19 (8): 921–928. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015.